MoparTech.net  
 
 
Go Back   Mopar Tech - Mopar and Muscle Car Tech Forums > Mopar Technical Archives > Engine Tech > Small Block Tech

Small Block Tech Don't feel left out just because you don't have a long arm in your mill. Go here!!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-23-2010, 03:38 PM
CUDA ROLAND's Avatar
CUDA ROLAND CUDA ROLAND is offline
Senior Member
Super Street
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Age: 54
Posts: 550
Talking 340 Build

well i am starter my moter build tell me what you think anny ideas fell free to chime in.. first i have a 340 punched .040 over running forged pitons...speed pro molly rings...eagle steel crank...h beam rods...speed pro 3/4 groved maines to incres oil to the rods...77 hp rod bearings...did some oil passag mods to incres oil flow to the bearings ...millins hv oil pump...hardend oil pump drive...running 10 in. deep pan with marroso high volum tube pick up...hp cam bearings... the cam is a hughes solid lift flat tapit cam...running the cool face solid lifters with the extra oil hole.... cam spec 610 lift in. 614 on the exh...dur at .050 is 256... center line 106... victor intake ported magnum heads... headers are 1 3/4 prim. to 3in. slip on col.. headmens race headers... 750 hp carb ... msd dist and 6al box..anny other ideas out ther...
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-24-2010, 08:37 AM
MRL Performance's Avatar
MRL Performance MRL Performance is offline
Site Sponsor
Top Fuel
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Jackson Michigan
Age: 38
Posts: 2,632
Do you have flow numbers on the heads?

I think its a solid combo, good for 500hp
__________________
Need a GREAT Engine for a FAIR Price? Look up MRLPERFORMANCE.com Today!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-24-2010, 02:20 PM
CUDA ROLAND's Avatar
CUDA ROLAND CUDA ROLAND is offline
Senior Member
Super Street
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Age: 54
Posts: 550
had some more port work dun intak 251 cfm exh 209 cfm thats with the small intake valve magnum head, i never thought a small valve head would flow that good. 466 casting magnum head...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-24-2010, 02:33 PM
Cheapstreet_duster's Avatar
Cheapstreet_duster Cheapstreet_duster is offline
Senior Member / Moderator
Top Fuel
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Age: 41
Posts: 3,310
should make some strong torque numbers....
take it easy breakin in the cam...
soundsl like a health combo ....Roland.
cheapst
__________________
i run heads up in pro fastest street car.
365 cu unported 915 heads,10x26 slick,3480lbs best 1.39 60ft ss springs 10.70@125
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-24-2010, 02:35 PM
CUDA ROLAND's Avatar
CUDA ROLAND CUDA ROLAND is offline
Senior Member
Super Street
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Age: 54
Posts: 550
thanks ,,, just trying to git a good set up to run at the southen nats in may...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-24-2010, 06:50 PM
79410aspenrt's Avatar
79410aspenrt 79410aspenrt is offline
79410aspenrt
Bracket Racer
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 119
good combo. the Hughes solid cams are good cams. they will make power. 480-500 hp.
__________________
1979 Aspen R/T A57
Mopar is in the Blood
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-24-2010, 10:16 PM
MRL Performance's Avatar
MRL Performance MRL Performance is offline
Site Sponsor
Top Fuel
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Jackson Michigan
Age: 38
Posts: 2,632
I hate to be the one to put a Bad spin on this, but those numbers look good, but not together. you have 83% exhaust flow compaired to the intake. Thats to much and will rob power. You need to have 70-75% to have a good balance between the intake and exhaust.

Im surprised Cheap didnt catch this.

What happens is the exhaust flows to much. And if it flows that good, it will flow good the reverse direction cause a ton of reversion. this is why NASCAR heads have a big intake valve, 2.10" or bigger and a small exhaust valve, 1.50" in most cases. they have to balance it out or you run into trouble.

there is nothing you can do about it with these heads, so i hope it all turns out well, but you are going to leave a bit on the table
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-25-2010, 02:59 PM
CUDA ROLAND's Avatar
CUDA ROLAND CUDA ROLAND is offline
Senior Member
Super Street
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Age: 54
Posts: 550
i was thinking that the header primery tube can help controll that,like the small 1 5/8 tubes will incres exh runner back presur and incres reversion at high rpm.. the 1 7/8 will cause exhust to flow out of the exh runner at a difrent rate and speed. that will help stop reversion. iwas going with the 1 3/4 to see how it works as a comperamise on exhust cylender scavenging. and reversion. what do you think??? also on the magnum head the exhust port is relativley small and by using a header with a larger tube than the port it will help to stop reversion also ther is (ar) header that can be used (ar) anti reversion headers.. i git what you are saying and agrey,but ther is ways around it...also i can go with the 2.02 valve report the heads and work of that but i am going to try the header thing first, also corect me if i am wrong but i thought that exhust reversion was a mid to low rpm thing...

Last edited by CUDA ROLAND : 03-27-2010 at 11:55 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-28-2010, 05:04 PM
CUDA ROLAND's Avatar
CUDA ROLAND CUDA ROLAND is offline
Senior Member
Super Street
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Age: 54
Posts: 550
have it built to a short block so far every thing whent well next step it to deg. the cam and ck for valve clearenc... have new magnum valve covers and hardend pump shaft on the way from indy heads. will have to redrill the head intake bolts with my drilling jig so i can fit and match port the intake to the heads,i use the intake gasket to git the port shap and size then i scrib marks on the heads with a strate edge acros the bottom of the ports the the ends of the head the run lines up all the ports to the top of the head after that i bolt the intake on with the gasket thin i transfer the marks from the head to the intake pull the intake and scrib lines down and a cdros using the transferd marks on the intake to math the intake runners to your heads this works better than gust using the gasket on the head and then puting the gasket on the intake without the alignment marks...

Last edited by CUDA ROLAND : 03-28-2010 at 06:02 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-30-2010, 04:29 PM
CUDA ROLAND's Avatar
CUDA ROLAND CUDA ROLAND is offline
Senior Member
Super Street
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Age: 54
Posts: 550
Thumbs down

well back to the drowing bored my valve springs ar not going to cut it that bined at .600 lift,,,i need to git to .614 my with the 8 mm valve stock lenth and my pockets to go with 1.750 spring hight anny one know if i can cut the pocket down th git the hight i need??? i think i will need to cut it anuff to git a sprig hight of 1.800 in there...
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-30-2010, 05:03 PM
MYBD318's Avatar
MYBD318 MYBD318 is offline
Senior Member
Top Fuel
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Age: 53
Posts: 2,071
Will Comp Cams Beehive springs help
__________________
1973 Duster 416ci
Redneck ported 587's, Flowed 264cfm @.600"
904 w/ lock-up converter
8-3/4, 3.91, clutch type suregrip
TTI's
One BADASS Street Car
Look'in to kick some Brand X & Z Butts!
04 HEMI Quad cab
74 Scamp, 318, mileage queen
05 SRT-4
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-30-2010, 06:17 PM
catfish's Avatar
catfish catfish is offline
Senior Member
Super Street
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Age: 44
Posts: 908
Does someone offer +.050" or +.100" positive retainers for the 8mm valves to gain the install height? I know they make these for other valves.

catfish
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-30-2010, 06:49 PM
catfish's Avatar
catfish catfish is offline
Senior Member
Super Street
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Age: 44
Posts: 908
Here's way's I see you correcting the reversion issue: (probably most you won't want to do)
run a single pattern cam
run 1.6:1 on intake and 1.5 on exhaust
upsize intake valves and port intake more
run large diameter headers and exhaust

The exhaust is probably your easiest solution, but most compromised. I'd personally have someone reflow the heads to confirm flow difference between intake and exhaust and if correct , upsize intake. Don't forget your cam is a split pattern that favors exhaust duration and lift to compensate for poor flowing exhaust ports. You're taking a very good exhaust port and making it better with that cam, biasing more toward reversion.

my $.02,
catfish

Last edited by catfish : 03-30-2010 at 06:52 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-15-2010, 09:42 AM
Tubbed440's Avatar
Tubbed440 Tubbed440 is offline
Member
Bracket Racer
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 145
Quote:
Originally Posted by catfish View Post
Here's way's I see you correcting the reversion issue: (probably most you won't want to do)
run a single pattern cam
run 1.6:1 on intake and 1.5 on exhaust

upsize intake valves and port intake more
run large diameter headers and exhaust

The exhaust is probably your easiest solution, but most compromised. I'd personally have someone reflow the heads to confirm flow difference between intake and exhaust and if correct , upsize intake. Don't forget your cam is a split pattern that favors exhaust duration and lift to compensate for poor flowing exhaust ports. You're taking a very good exhaust port and making it better with that cam, biasing more toward reversion.

my $.02,
catfish
I was just about to type the same thing..... I second this one for a quick fix.
__________________
74 Dodge Challenger
500 Wedge, EFI, 4L80E
Work in Progress
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-15-2010, 11:03 AM
Canuk74Charger's Avatar
Canuk74Charger Canuk74Charger is offline
Senior Member
Super Street
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Woodland Beach, Ontario Canada
Age: 23
Posts: 477
Why run a larger ratio rocker on the intake and less on the exhaust? I noticed racer Brown rockers come in sets like this, not sure the advantage of 1.6 & 1.5 to just all 1.6
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 04-01-2010, 04:33 AM
CUDA ROLAND's Avatar
CUDA ROLAND CUDA ROLAND is offline
Senior Member
Super Street
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Age: 54
Posts: 550
i am looking at removing the 194 valves and going with the 202 intake also i am going to have to lower the valve pocits .080 to make the new valve springs work...
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-01-2010, 07:02 AM
MRL Performance's Avatar
MRL Performance MRL Performance is offline
Site Sponsor
Top Fuel
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Jackson Michigan
Age: 38
Posts: 2,632
If these are STOCK Magnum heads, I would not go to a 2.02" intake. 2.00" max. They are already prone to cracking between the valves and cutting it out that much will only make it worse.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 04-01-2010, 05:09 PM
CUDA ROLAND's Avatar
CUDA ROLAND CUDA ROLAND is offline
Senior Member
Super Street
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Age: 54
Posts: 550
well super mike from mrl performace save the day once more just got of the phone with him and he found a set of springs for my heads that will work with my cam and not have to cut the pockets thank mike
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 04-14-2010, 03:38 PM
CUDA ROLAND's Avatar
CUDA ROLAND CUDA ROLAND is offline
Senior Member
Super Street
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Age: 54
Posts: 550
well the new springs are hear thay install at 1.700 coil bined at 1.028 so i shoud be go to go with .600 lift after taking away my valve lash...thanks againe mike for the help on the springs
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 04-14-2010, 05:29 PM
CUDA ROLAND's Avatar
CUDA ROLAND CUDA ROLAND is offline
Senior Member
Super Street
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Age: 54
Posts: 550
just came in from the shop clayed the piton and did a valve clearance ck got .115 on exh. .109 intake looks good one thing i noteced is that the 340 pistons come out above the deck i am running closed chamber heads i clayed the pisto to ck head clearance i had about .045 from the head to the piston top is this ok????
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 04-14-2010, 06:03 PM
MrN2OBelvedere's Avatar
MrN2OBelvedere MrN2OBelvedere is offline
Senior Member
Super Street
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 851
.045 should be fine.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 04-14-2010, 07:30 PM
challenger500's Avatar
challenger500 challenger500 is offline
Senior Member
Pro Stock
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,017
Perfect !!!! At that clearance, your piston will quench. I would be a bit more concerned with valve to piston clearance....Your's seems a bit close to me, but, I'm not the sb expert...lol Ask Mike on that to be sure. My bb is .125" on exhaust, and .155" on intake... I have been told .125 is minimum. My 2 cents tho....
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 04-15-2010, 02:48 AM
CUDA ROLAND's Avatar
CUDA ROLAND CUDA ROLAND is offline
Senior Member
Super Street
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Age: 54
Posts: 550
i misread my dial gauge did not reset it my piston to head clearance is a lot closer it is .020,,, On my valve i pulled up the spec from hughes it is .100 on exh and .080 on in.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 04-15-2010, 06:17 AM
challenger500's Avatar
challenger500 challenger500 is offline
Senior Member
Pro Stock
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,017
Call Mike.... Seems to me .040" is minimum clearance piston to head.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 04-15-2010, 06:49 AM
RacerHog's Avatar
RacerHog RacerHog is offline
Bob (Cowboy) Hogan
Top Fuel
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Monrovia SO-CAL
Age: 47
Posts: 4,226
How Far up out of the hole are the pistons?
__________________
Bob Hogan Racing
Monrovia SO-CAL
SMOK'EM With MOPAR
http://public.fotki.com/racerhog/
http://s289.photobucket.com/home/racerhog1
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:22 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
MoparTech.net
Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Valid CSS!